Tweet |

- The graph above includes events that may have influenced the candidates' probability of winning. We have tried to find events that were turning points in the election campaigns. If there are other events that you think caused some of the turning points in the election, please let us know via the contact page or the comment section below.

- One major caveat on the accuracy of the predictions for 2016 is the effect that Trump and populism have on the accuracy of the polls. Trump has defied several predictions during the Republican primary campaign, and many people came out to vote for him that have not voted in many years. This means that the models that pollsters use to determine who are "likely voters" may not be accurate for this election cycle. We assume that as the election season progresses, pollsters will be able to update and refine their models so that as we get closer to the election, the polls will be more reliable and accurate.

In addition to looking at probabilities of Clinton or Trump winning, we can also look at the probabilities of achieving different electoral vote results. That is, what is the probability that Clinton or Trump will collect say, 270, 285, or 300 electoral votes? (Note that the probability of either of them winning the election is the probability that they will collect 270 or more electoral votes).

The figure on the left shows the probabilities of each of the candidates achieving given electoral vote totals, which vary from zero to 538. The points where the curves are the highest correspond to the most likely electoral votes for each candidate.

As of November 8th, the most likely electoral vote outcome is 289 for Clinton and 249 for Trump.

It is also instructive to see how sensitive this probability is to changes in state poll results. That is, which states impact the result the most if their polls change in favor of one candidate or another?

In the figure on the left, we see the resulting probability of an Clinton win, given changes in state polls from the five states with the most potential upside for Clinton or downside for Trump.

To keep the figure easy to read, it only includes the resulting probability of an Clinton win. The resulting probability of a Trump win is simply 100 minus the probability of an Clinton win.

As of November 8th, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin have the most potential upside for Clinton. If any of their state polls change by 10% in favor of Clinton (i.e. 5% switch from Trump to Clinton in any state), Clinton's probability of winning increases to around 77%-80% and Trump's probability of winning drops to around 20%-23%.

The results in this plot may not be as informative as one would hope, though. This is due to the fact that this plot shows how the resulting probability of winning changes *if* a particular state's poll results change by a certain amount. But it doesn't capture the likelihood that that state's poll will change by that amount. Therefore, keep this caveat in mind when interpreting the plot.

This figure is similar to the previous one, with the only difference being that it corresponds to changes in state polls from the five states with the most potential downside for Clinton or upside for Trump.

Again, to keep the figure easy to read, it only includes the resulting probability of an Clinton win. The resulting probability of a Trump win is simply 100 minus the probability of an Clinton win.

As of November 8th, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina, Florida, and Arizona have the most potential downside for Clinton. If any of their state polls change by 10% in favor of Trump (i.e. 5% switch from Clinton to Trump), Clinton's probability of winning decreases to around 65%-67% and Trump's probability of winning jumps to 33%-35%.